Tuesday, May 26, 2020

An Analysisi of Guy de Maupassants the Necklace Essay

Guy de Maupassants quot;The Necklacequot; During the course of Guy de Maupassants short story quot;The Necklace,quot; the main character, Matilda Loisel, makes a number of ironic discoveries. In addition, there are other discoveries that the reader makes but Matilda does not. The discovery that forms the storys climax concerns the true nature of the necklace she has borrowed from her friend Mrs. Forestier. But this is perhaps not the most important lesson of this story. As the story opens, Matilda, a young middle-class wife who aspires to join the upper ranks of society, is finally invited to a high-society affair given by her husbands employer. Hoping to impress her guests and thus quot;fit inquot;, she borrows a beautiful†¦show more content†¦Now comes the task of paying back all the money that the Loisels have borrowed. In order to do so, quot;they sent away the maid; they changed their lodgings; they rented some rooms under a mansard roof.quot; A mansard roof is very steeply pitched, so that it is possible to have living quarters beneath it; by implication, living quot;under a mansard roofquot; means they live in the attic. No longer is Matilda able to send her laundry out to be cleaned, or employ someone to wash the dishes and care for the house. Because houses in those days had no running water, she has to haul the water up the stairs to the attic herself. Her husband is forced to take on a second and even a third job. They are consci entious and hard-working, however, and by the end of ten years they have repaid every creditor. But at what a cost! Matilda is no longer lovely and refined; she now looks old, haggard, and common. When she meets Mrs. Forestier in the street, her friend does not even recognize her. The story ends with Mrs. Forestiers revelation that the stones in the original necklace weren’t even really diamonds -- they were

Friday, May 15, 2020

Bundling Campaign Contributions - How It Works

Bundling campaign  contributions is a common practice in American congressional and presidential elections. The term bundling refers to a form of fundraising in which one person or small groups of people—lobbyists, business owners, special interest groups, or activists seeking legislative action—convince  their wealthy friends, co-workers, and other like-minded donors to simultaneously write checks to their preferred candidate for public office. It is not uncommon for bundlers to raise hundreds of millions of dollars in a presidential-election year and receive special treatment in return for their work. A bundler is a person or small group of people  who pool or aggregate these contributions and then deliver them in one lump sum to a political campaign. In the 2000 presidential campaign, Republican nominee  George W. Bush used the term pioneers to describe bundlers who raised at least $100,000 for his White House bid. Bundlers are often rewarded by successful candidates with plum positions in an administration or other political favors.  Four out of five of Democratic presidential nominee  Barack Obamas largest fundraisers in the 2008 presidential campaign received  key posts in his administration, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Responsive Politics. Bundling is a legal way for campaign supporters to circumvent  individual contribution limits set forth in federal campaign finance laws. As of 2019, an individual can contribute up to $2,800 to a candidate for federal office in a single election, or up to $5,600 per election cycle (since the primary and general election are separate elections.) But bundlers can persuade like-minded donors to give at once, typically by inviting them to a fundraiser or special event and, in turn, rolling up those contributions into massive sums of money to federal candidates. Not Heavily Regulated The Federal Election Commission (FEC), the entity that regulates campaign-finance laws in the United States,  requires candidates for federal office  to disclose the funds bundled by registered lobbyists. As of 2018, the FEC required candidates or parties to file a report when they received a contribution that was bundled in two or more checks that exceeded the threshold of $18,200 in the calendar year. For everyone whos not a lobbyists disclosure is voluntary and sporadic. In the 2008 presidential election, for example, Obama and Republican nominee John McCain both agreed to make public the names of bundlers who raised more than $50,000. The FEC rules, however, are considered loose by government watchdogs and  easily circumvented by crafty bundlers and lobbyists wishing to remain out of the public eye. In some cases, bundlers can avoid disclosing their role in raising large sums of money for a campaign by never physically pooling and delivering the checks, just organizing the fundraising.   How Much Raised? Bundlers are responsible for generating tens of millions of dollars to their preferred candidates. In the 2012 presidential race, for example, bundlers delivered about $200 million to Obamas campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. According to the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, Bundlers, who are often corporate CEOs, lobbyists, hedge fund managers or independently wealthy people, are able to funnel far more money to campaigns than they could personally give under campaign finance laws. President Donald Trump didnt rely heavily on big dollar donations or bundlers in the 2016 election, but did turn to them in his reelection bid in 2020. Why Bundlers Bundle Bundlers who deliver large amounts of campaign cash to candidates have been rewarded with access to prominent White House advisers and strategists, official titles and privileged treatment in campaigns, and ambassadorships and other plum political appointments. The Center for Public Integrity reported that Obama rewarded about 200 bundlers with jobs and appointments. According to Public Citizen: Bundlers play an enormous role in determining the success of political campaigns and are apt to receive preferential treatment if their candidate wins. Bundlers who direct money to presidential candidates tend to be first in line for plum ambassador positions and other political appointments. Industry titans and lobbyists are more likely to receive preferential treatment from elected officials if they raised large amounts of money for them. When Is It Illegal? Bundlers seeking political favors often promise big money to candidates. And sometimes they fail to deliver. So in some cases, bundlers have been known to give large sums of money to employees, family members and friends with the implicit goal of having those employees, family members and friends turn around and contribute to a candidate for Congress or the presidency. Thats illegal.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Critique of The Pentagons New Map - 1510 Words

Critique of Thomas Barnett’s â€Å"The Pentagon’s New Map† 1. Critique the Author’s Thesis: Thomas Barnett, in the article, â€Å"The Pentagon’s New Map: It Explains Why We’re Going to War, and Why We’ll Keep Going to War,† says that disconnectedness defines danger . Barnett describes two parts of the world he calls The Functioning Core and The Non-Integrating Gap . The Functioning Core, also called the â€Å"Core†, features regions thick with network connectivity, financial transactions, liberal media flows, collective security, with stable governments, rising standards of living and more deaths by suicide than murder . The Non-Integrating Gap, also known as the â€Å"Gap† features regions where globalization is thinning or just plain absent,†¦show more content†¦Our security problem becomes one of managing countries that are weak in globalization. This is clear in our responses to Afghanistan and Iraq. Both countries sit firmly within the Gap. Barnett talks about the impor tance of stopping the terrorists from access to the Core via the â€Å"seam States† along the boundaries of the Gap . This is a good argument if the movement of the terrorist cells were strictly ground forces moving through the neighboring states. However, the concept of seam states is lessened in these times of increased mobility. It is vital to protect seam states, as it is vital to protect other areas of entry, such as airports. The Gap terrorists can skip over the seam states directly into Core countries. In the way ahead, he argues that the goal of the United States should be to concentrate on shrinking the Gap by all means possible . Ultimately the members of the Gap need to become connected with the Core. Barnett states that in the future integration of the Gap will depend on more private investment. For example, Africa will need a lot more aid than has been provided in the past and more than public Core can handle . I submit that before these areas can be assi sted by private investment, there will have to be substantial resources expended in the form of money and soldiers required to stabilize these regions. For a nation that has been at war with two different Gap countries for more than 11 years, this willShow MoreRelatedC112 Theorist Critique Assignment1913 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿C112 Theorist Critique Assignment Name: ___________________________________ Date: ______________________________ You will select one of the four International Security Environment (ISE) theorists presented in lesson C112 (Kaplan, Friedman, Huntington, or Barnett), and answer the five requirements beginning on page two of this document. This assignment is worth 25% of the C100 grade. The four readings from which to choose are listed below. Barnett The Pentagon’s New Map: It Explains

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Nursing Guidelines during Clinical Placement Sample for Students

Question: Discuss about the Code of Ethics For Nurses in Australia. Answer: Nursing Guidelines during Clinical Placement The Code of Professional Conduct for Nurses in Australia (2006) is supported by The Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia (2008). These two documents set the standards for the nursing practice. The codes together with the other practice standards provide the guidelines for professional and legal nursing practice in the management, clinical, and in the research domain. These codes are intended for various audiences, they include Nursing students, nurses, health workers, and patients. Having this in mind, the essay will discuss how the two documents guide nursing professionals in their clinical practice, this will be supported by relevant references. According to the codes of conducts, nurses are to practice in a competent and safe manner. In this case, nurses are supposed to provide competent and safe nursing care. It is the nurses responsibility to act competently in their clinical practice. In order for nurses to act and remain competent, they should participate in professional development programs, this is imperative, as it will improve their knowledge and skills relevant to their clinical practice. Further, the safety of the patients is the primary concern in the clinical practice. Therefore, nurses should undertake activities that are within their scope to avoid compromising the safety of patients. In addition, nurses should act in a competent and safe manner without being comprised by their health; this includes the use of substances and alcohol, which will affect the nurses ability to practice safely. Thus, if the health of nurses affects the ability of nurses to practice competently and safely, they should seek assistanc e in order to address the needs of their health. Nurses are supposed to practice in accordance with the guidelines in the profession and in the health system (Kangasniemi, Pakkanen Korhonen, 2015). Nurses have a duty of ensuring their standards of practice conform to their professional standards to ensure the safety of the patients. In this case, nurses should practice in accordance with the broader standards of quality and safe health care, such as information management, health documentation, event analysis, and disclosure procedures. The substantial role of nurses is to provide competent and safe nursing care. Therefore, any event that will compromise ethical practice or may hinder the professional practice should be made known. In the case where the issue is not set on and continues to hinder the nursing practice, other nurses should intervene and report the issue to the relevant authority. Finally, nurses should be aware of their professional position, hence, should not accept presents and gifts, which can be viewed as a form of securing favors. Nurses are to practice in accordance with the laws and regulation relevant to the nursing profession. Nurses should ensure they conduct themselves in an ethical manner. In this case, nurses should ensure their clinical practices are in accordance with the governing delegates or laws. Nurses have an obligation to report unethical practices of a colleague to the relevant authority and to take appropriate actions to protect the public interest. However, in cases where the employer on unethical nurses does not take appropriate actions, nurses are obliged to report the issue to an external authority. According to the codes of ethics for the Australian nurses, nurses are to respect the culture, dignity, ethnicity, beliefs, and values of their colleagues and for the people receiving treatment. In the planning of an effective care, nurses are required to uphold the standards of competent care and culturally informed, this includes considerations and respect of the cultural values, personal wishes, knowledge, and dignity of other people. Nurses should understand that families are constituted in different ways, hence should respect the nature of families. Further, nurses should protect and promote the patient's interest, this includes ensuring quality and safety of care is not hindered by the attitude of race, tribal prejudice, gender, culture, age, sexuality, political, and health status just to mention a few. Nurses should also cease from portraying sexist, racist, ageist, homophobic, and other forms of discrimination to their patients, colleagues, and to other partners. Hence, nurs es should take necessary actions if they notice such discriminatory behaviors to the relevant authority. Therefore, when nurses are making a specialized decision relating to the rights and interests of persons, they should not breach the law or contravene the human rights. The code of ethics direct nurses to treat the information gathered in the course of their clinical practice as private (Green, 2017). In this case, it is both an ethical and legal requirement for nurses to protect the privacy for persons receiving or requiring care. Nurses are restricted to use the information gathered only for professional purposes. However, nurses can disclose the information gathered to other members of the medical team for decision-making purposes. Consequently, where applicable, nurses should seek the approval of the persons receiving care before disclosing such information. In the nonexistence of approval, nurses should use their professional judgment in disclosing the information, in such a case, the nurse should consider the wellbeing, interest, and the safety of the person before making such disclosures (Birks, Davis, Smithson, Cant, 2016). Nurses are to provide honest, impartial, and accurate information in regards to the health care products and the nursing care (Casey et al. 2017). Nurses should explain all the disadvantages and the advantages of using a particular product so that individuals can make an informed decision in using the product. In this case, nurses should cease from misinformation, exploitation, and misrepresentation of the health care products. In addition, nurses should accurately disclose accurate information on the nature of nursing care they provide (Green, 2017). Hence, the deception on the nursing care and the endorsement of products for their personal gain is improper and unethical. Therefore, the codes of conduct stipulate that nurses to support the wellbeing, health, and the decisions of the persons receiving care and they should assist persons to make decisions on their health. However, in cases where a person is unwilling or unable to speak independently, nurses should ensure representatio n by an apt advocate. Nurses are supposed to preserve and promote the privilege and trust intrinsic in the relationship between the persons receiving care and the nurses (Bernoth, Dietsch, Burmeister Schwartz, 2014). The intrinsic factor can lead to power balance. The power balance between the nurse and the person receiving care arise in cases where the persons receiving care has limited knowledge, needs assistance, is in pain, and belongs to a minority group just to mention a few. These intrinsic factors between nurses and persons receiving care may make the persons receiving care vulnerable to exploitation. In this case, the intrinsic factors should be recognized and manage by upholding the dignity of the persons they attend through practicing respect and kindness to all. Further, nurses should apply measures to establish trust in order to ensure the emotional, psychological, and wellbeing of the persons receiving care is protected (Birks, Davis, Smithson Cant, 2016). The Australian code of conduct for nurses requires nurses to build and maintain public confidence and trust in the course of their practice (Schmidt, MacWilliams Neal-Boylan, 2016). Unethical and unlawful practices by nurses adversely affect the reputation of the profession in the public eye. In this case, nurses are supposed to consider the interest of the nursing profession when expressing their rights to speech when participating in academic and political debates. Therefore, it is the obligation of nurses to build and maintain public confidence and trust in the profession always (Schneider Whitehead, 2013). Finally, nurses should at all time practice ethically and reflectively. According to the codes of Ethics, nurses should maintain and develop current and appropriate support, nursing advice, and care for all the persons receiving and requiring care, this duty applies also to nurse partners (Cashin, Bryce, Devey, Buckley, Cox Fisher, 2016). In order for nurses to provide quality of care, they should act competently in accordance with the guiding standards as stipulated in the code of conducts for the Australian nurses. In addition, nurses should not involve themselves in a sexual relationship with the persons under their care as such relationships raise integrity concerns. In the case of intimate or sexual behaviors, the consent cannot be used as a defense. In addition, nurses are not supposed to provide care to persons they have not- professional relationships, if possible, re- assignment of such persons to other nurses should be considered. Therefore, practicing nurses should take r ational steps to secure and ensure the safety of the persons receiving their care. In conclusion, The Code of Professional Conduct for Nurses in Australia (2006) and The Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia (2008) are the documents that provide the ethical guidelines to be used in the nursing practice. These codes of conduct are intended for various audiences, they include Nursing students, nurses, health workers, and patients just to mention a few. The purpose of the documents is to set an outline on the standards of conduct expected from the nursing profession. The codes are also formulated to inform the public on the professional standards expected from the Australian nurses. Therefore, Australian nurses are expected to uphold integrity in their clinical practice in order to safeguard the safety of the persons seeking medical care. References Cashin, A., Heartfield, M., Bryce, J., Devey, L., Buckley, T., Cox, D., ... Fisher, M. (2016). Standards for practice for registered nurses in Australia.Collegian. Schneider, Z., Whitehead, D. (2013).Nursing and midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Australia. Birks, M., Davis, J., Smithson, J., Cant, R. (2016). Registered nurse scope of practice in Australia: an integrative review of the literature.Contemporary Nurse,52(5), 522-543. Green, J. (2017). Nurses online behaviour: lessons for the nursing profession.Contemporary Nurse, 1-11. Murray?Parahi, P., Edgar, V., Descallar, J., Comino, E., Johnson, M. (2017). ENsCOPE: Scoping the Practice of Enrolled Nurses in an Australian Community Health Setting.International nursing review,64(1), 59-68. Casey, M., Cooney, A., O'Connell, R., Hegarty, J. M., Brady, A. M., O'Reilly, P., ... O'Connor, L. (2017). Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions on requirements to demonstrate the maintenance of professional competence.Journal of advanced nursing,73(3), 653-664. Schmidt, B. J., MacWilliams, B. R., Neal-Boylan, L. (2016). Becoming Inclusive: A Code of Conduct for Inclusion and Diversity.Journal of Professional Nursing. Bernoth, M., Dietsch, E., Burmeister, O. K., Schwartz, M. (2014). Information management in aged care: cases of confidentiality and elder abuse.Journal of business ethics,122(3), 453-460. Kangasniemi, M., Pakkanen, P., Korhonen, A. (2015). Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review.Journal of advanced nursing,71(8), 1744-1757. Schneider, Z., Whitehead, D. (2013).Nursing and midwifery research: methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Australia. Birks, M., Davis, J., Smithson, J., Cant, R. (2016). Registered nurse scope of practice in Australia: an integrative review of the literature.Contemporary Nurse,52(5), 522-543. Casey, M., Cooney, A., O'Connell, R., Hegarty, J. M., Brady, A. M., O'Reilly, P., ... O'Connor, L. (2017). Nurses', midwives' and key stakeholders' experiences and perceptions on requirements to demonstrate the maintenance of professional competence.Journal of advanced nursing,73(3), 653-664